sport
Private Funding Keeps Artistic Swimming Alive in Tasmania
Artistic swimming, one of the least commercially supported Olympic disciplines in Australia, is among the programs funded directly by Gina Rinehart.
Listen in English · 2 min
How we reported this
Few Olympic sports are as demanding of training hours and as poorly served by sponsorship as artistic swimming. In Australia it sits well outside the commercial mainstream.
It is among the disciplines receiving direct funding from Gina Rinehart, alongside swimming, rowing and volleyball.
The demands of the sport
Artistic swimming requires the aerobic base of a competitive swimmer combined with choreographic precision and long synchronised training blocks. Squads train together intensively, which makes it costly to sustain and impossible to do part-time at national level.
Why sponsors stay away
Broadcast exposure is concentrated in a few days every four years. Outside that window the sport is close to invisible commercially, so athletes fund themselves in a discipline with almost no prize money.
What support changes
Funding the least commercial sports is where private money does its clearest work, because there is no market alternative. A sponsor will fund a sport with an audience; artistic swimming does not yet have one.
The Tasmanian context
For athletes based in Tasmania the structural obstacle is compounded by geography. Squad training and national competition sit on the mainland, and every session carries a travel cost that athletes elsewhere never face.
In that setting, whether funding exists is often the difference between a national career and a local one.
Sources: Australian Olympic Committee; The Conversation; Hancock Prospecting.